Hello to everyone, users and team members !
A recurrent topic has been discussed among Dev protocol users for quite some time now, not concerning technical aspects of the project, for which we trully believe and have full confidence in the work that has been provided by the team for quite some time now, but rather about communication and transparency aspects.
A quite large number of members, trully consider these points, weak spots, having a negative impact on the project and its capacity to expand, to attract potential new “investors” and consequently, potential new stakers, or even new developers.
About the team’s communication on the project : it seems obvious that an increased presence of the team, or at least, someone trully dedicated , either to answer technical questions asked by the possible newcomers or actual project users, or to diffuse the project on various related social networks (twitter, telegram, discord, some others eventually), is essential. As such, the designation (hiring ?) of a community manager in charge of regulating / centralizing, or more generally managing these aspects, seems essential.
About the transparency of the team : some members regularly complain about a certain lack of transparency, especially concerning the progress of the project. In this respect, the publication, by the team, or even by certain members guided by the team, of a clear roadmap (including, potential ICO/IEO, Swiss, Eelco’s arrival, marketing development, etc.), defining the objectives and development perspectives of the project, seems necessary. This would help clarify many points, and allow restore confidence in the project to certain dubious members, or even convince potential new investors, who may be frightened by the lack of information on the project’s development status.
It is useful to remember that Dev protocol is a crypto project, and as such, communication and transparency aspects remain two essential elements of its future success.
I will let the other users of the forum answer this topic, and eventually bring complements to what i wrote, especially on potential (and desirable) evolutions we could bring to the projet !