いいクリエイターを選定するための補助機能(Aiding in the selection of good creators)

概要

stakes.socialに表示されるProperty一覧を一定の基準に従ってソートします。

詳細

クリエイターの数が増え、ステイカーはどこにステーキングすればいいのかわかりづらくなっています。
なので、stakes.socialに表示されるProperty一覧を一定の基準でソートし、優良なクリエイターを上位に表示させます。
直近ではGitHubのスター数の降順でソートします。怪しいものはもちろん除外します。
いずれはカルマ値で降順ソートします。
カルマの計算方法は今のものと変更する予定です。
他のクリエイターにステーキングしているかどうかなどが大きな判定基準となるでしょう。

この機能のDIPを記述しようと思います。
ご意見あればいただけませんでしょうか。

参考:New Karma System - Proposal - #4 by Pdot

追記:
スター数はお金で増やすことができるので、まずは独自の計算式を使ったKarmaを利用したソート機能の実装のみを目指すべきではないかと思いました。

===========================================================

description

Sort the list of properties displayed in stakes.social according to certain criteria.

detail

As the number of creators increases, stakers will not know where to stake their staking.
So, we will sort the list of properties displayed on stakes.social by certain criteria and display the best creators at the top.
First, sort in descending order of the number of GitHub stars.We will of course exclude anything suspicious.
It will eventually sort in descending order by karma value.
The method of calculating karma will be changed from the current one.
A major criterion will be whether or not you are staking to other creators.

I am going to write a DIP for this feature.
If you have any suggestions, please let me know.

see: New Karma System - Proposal - #4 by Pdot

Postscript.
Since the number of stars can be increased with money, I thought that we should first only aim to implement a sorting function using Karma with our own formula.

2 Likes

I would like to see if we can add an upvote system for projects where users can vote +/-

  • this will be helpful for projects with fewer stars but trusted by users to gain some exposure
  • no idea how to incorporate that with the proposed formula
2 Likes

Good is subjective.
Like I mentioned on this post - New Karma System - Proposal - #4 by Pdot - I think that there should be way to filter projects by Stars, Followers, any quantitative variable that can rank them by ‘fame’.
AND
There should be also our own version of a point system by positive impact on the Dev Protocol Ecosystem, a lot of stakers want to help Dev grow and be successful, not only help projects per se, so by creating this point system or metric, it would help a lot.

If there is a feature such as giving voting rights to those who are staking more, it could be utilized.
Let us discuss this in another forum after we implement the sorting feature in karma.

1 Like

I felt it would be better to discuss Karma’s formula in the link.

1 Like